Hi again. I know I owe you all an Avery update and I will do so very soon. Right now, I have this pressing issue to share with all of you following Avery and our family's journey...
There is a huge push right now within the disability world to boycott this movie...and I have to agree with the drive behind this movement and with the piece I've copied to share with you below. Please consider boycotting this movie and send the message that some things are really off-limits. Each day our differently-abled children are made fun of by others, looked at with pity, and/or viewed as less of a person than their typical peers. Nothing makes me sadder than that...than to think of the way some may view my SWEET and PERFECT (in my eyes and certainly God's eyes) Avery. I know there are many looks and comments to come in our future, but I do dare to dream of a day when she is accepted for who she is and as she is without societal discrimination. How can we ever expect that to happen with movies like this sending the message to adults, and even more horrific, our children's typical peers, that a person with a cognitive disability is acceptable fodder for jokes and a good comedy expense? Aren't we better than that? If you think so...please say so with your pocket book...don't reward the movie maker and actors for this dehumanizing work.
What 'Tropic Thunder'
Thinks Is Funny By Timothy Shriver I've been told to keep my sense of humor about
the film "Tropic Thunder," which opens this week. Despite my requests, I have
not been given the chance to see the movie. But I've seen previews, read about
it and read excerpts of the script. By all accounts, it is an unchecked assault
on the humanity of people with intellectual disabilities -- an affront to
dignity, hope and respect. Consider this exchange: Ben Stiller's character: "There were times when
I was doing Jack when I actually felt retarded. Like really
retarded." Robert Downey Jr.'s character: "Oh yeah.
Damn." Stiller: "In a weird way, I had to sort of just
free myself up to believe that it was okay to be stupid or
dumb." Downey: "To be a moron." Stiller: "Yeah." At another point, about acting like a person
with intellectual disabilities, they say: Stiller: "It's what we do,
right?" Downey: "Everybody knows you never do a full
retard." Stiller: "What do you mean?" Downey: "Check it out. Dustin Hoffman, 'Rain
Man,' look retarded, act retarded, not retarded. Count toothpicks to your cards.
Autistic, sure. Not retarded. You know Tom Hanks, 'Forrest Gump.' Slow, yes.
Retarded, maybe. Braces on his legs. But he charmed the pants off Nixon and won
a ping-pong competition. That ain't retarded. You went full retard, man. Never
go full retard." I worked with the Farrelly brothers on a film
on this topic. I know about edgy comedy. I'm also told that movies are
equal-opportunity offenders. So here's an equal-opportunity response to the
equal-opportunity offenders: People with intellectual disabilities are
routinely abused, neglected, insulted, institutionalized and even killed around
the world. Their parents are told to give up, that their children are worthless.
Schools turn them away. Doctors refuse to treat them. Employers won't hire them.
None of this is funny. For centuries, they have been the exception to
the most basic spiritual principle: that we are each equal in spirit, capable of
reflecting the goodness of the divine, carriers of love. But not people with
intellectual disabilities. What's a word commonly applied to them?
Hopeless. Let's consider where we are in 2008. Our
politics are about overcoming division, our social movements are about ending
intolerance, our great philanthropists promote ending poverty and disease among
the world's poor. Are people with intellectual disabilities included in the
mainstream of these movements? For the most part, no. Why? Because they're different. Their joy
doesn't fit on magazine covers. Their spirituality doesn't come in self-help
television. Their kind of wealth doesn't command political attention. (The best
of the spirit never does.) Sadly, they're such an easy target that many
people don't realize whom they are making fun of when they use the word
"retard." Most people just think it's funny. "Stupid, idiot, moron, retard." Ha,
ha, ha. I know: I could be too sensitive. But I was
taught that mean isn't funny. And I've been to institutions where people with
intellectual disabilities are tied to beds or lie on concrete floors, forgotten.
I've heard doctors say they won't treat them. I know Gallup found that more than
60 percent of Americans don't want a person with an intellectual disability at
their child's school. I've talked to people with intellectual
disabilities who cry over being insulted on a bus. I've received too many
e-mails from people who are devastated not by their child's disability but by
the terror of being laughed at, excluded and economically
devastated. It wasn't funny when Hollywood humiliated
African Americans for a generation. It's never funny when good and decent human
beings are humiliated. In fact, it is dangerous and
disgusting. This film is all that and more. DreamWorks went
so far as to create a mini-version of Simple Jack and posted it online. The
studio has since pulled it down, realizing it had gone too far, even in an age
of edgy, R-rated comedies. So, enough. Stop the hurtful jokes. Talk to
your children about language that is bullying and mean. Ask your friends, your
educators, your religious leaders to help us to end the stubborn myth that
people with intellectual disabilities are hopeless. Ask Hollywood to get on the
right side of dignity. I hope others will join me in shutting this
movie out of our lives and our pocketbooks. We don't live in times when labeling
and humiliating others is funny. And we should send that message far and
wide. The writer is chairman of Special
Olympics and a columnist for washingtonpost.
Monday, August 11, 2008;
A15
Comments